We're not gonna have a split society

[trimmer21]

My medical information is between me and my MD (and the MOH) not some minimum wage grocery clerk or a rent-a-cop. If there's an issue,I'll take my business elsewhere and I'll make sure upper management knows it. If businesses are so concerned,they have the option to stay closed. We'll get along without them,no problem.

[MikePal]

Not too many will refuse your money....especially if it'll set them up to be boycotted by the 'non-complaint' protesters standing in front of the store.

(Works for the left wing radicals , why not

[canadaman30]

(Works for the left wing radicals , why not

I'm offended by that name MikePal, please refer to them by their real names,....left wing losers ....

[dean.f]

My medical information is between me and my MD (and the MOH) not some minimum wage grocery clerk or a rent-a-cop. If there's an issue,I'll take my business elsewhere and I'll make sure upper management knows it. If businesses are so concerned,they have the option to stay closed. We'll get along without them,no problem.

This here is how I feel, answering questions about your personal health to strangers should never be a requirement. It seems to be pretty common recently to ask people direct questions about things that are frankly, none of anyone's business. If you are scared of people having their privacy, go hide under a rock.

In case you wonder, I'm fully vaccinated although I was under duress

[MarkB]

Guys, you know I'm not a left wing nut ... but I don't think it's gonna be that cut and dry.

Right now, businesses have to decide what is right for BOTH those vaccinated and not vaccinated.
There will be a big push back from those vaccinated to have additional measures for those not vaccinated ...
and given in Ontario at least 80% will be vaccinated ... yes, money talks ... the 80% will win if this comes to a head.

Here's an example ... in my line of work, we build major projects ... some in remote camp sites. Some clients are insisting
that only vaccinated people will be allowed on site. This is real, and no one is stopping them from enforcing that "rule".

As you know, certain universities in Ontario have drawn the line and said only people that are double vaccinated will be
allowed on campus in person.

Anti-vaxxers can cry all they want about those kinds of rules, but until this is challenged and won at the Supreme Court (many
years from now) ... there's zero direction from the government, and in fact, government probably won't put any pressure on
these companies, as they WANT people to vaccinate.

So ... for sure there will be rules in place from one business to the next that will treat those vaccinated differently to those
unvaccinated.

[canadaman30]

Guys, you know I'm not a left wing nut ... but I don't think it's gonna be that cut and dry.

Right now, businesses have to decide what is right for BOTH those vaccinated and not vaccinated.
There will be a big push back from those vaccinated to have additional measures for those not vaccinated ...
and given in Ontario at least 80% will be vaccinated ... yes, money talks ... the 80% will win if this comes to a head.

Here's an example ... in my line of work, we build major projects ... some in remote camp sites. Some clients are insisting
that only vaccinated people will be allowed on site. This is real, and no one is stopping them from enforcing that "rule".

As you know, certain universities in Ontario have drawn the line and said only people that are double vaccinated will be
allowed on campus in person.

Anti-vaxxers can cry all they want about those kinds of rules, but until this is challenged and won at the Supreme Court (many
years from now) ... there's zero direction from the government, and in fact, government probably won't put any pressure on
these companies, as they WANT people to vaccinate.

So ... for sure there will be rules in place from one business to the next that will treat those vaccinated differently to those
unvaccinated.

If the un-vaccinated are such a health hazard, how possibly do we have provinces in our country wide open with no masks, yet the numbers are declining...?..
This fact alone can't be true if you buy into the MSM fear factor.

The fear is more dangerous than the virus...

[impact]

Smart business people will cater to both camps. Marketing 101.
This is already seen by the explosion of free speech sites now available.
The divide and conquer narrative is crumbling.

[Badenoch]

Guys, you know I'm not a left wing nut ... but I don't think it's gonna be that cut and dry.

Right now, businesses have to decide what is right for BOTH those vaccinated and not vaccinated.
There will be a big push back from those vaccinated to have additional measures for those not vaccinated ...
and given in Ontario at least 80% will be vaccinated ... yes, money talks ... the 80% will win if this comes to a head.

Here's an example ... in my line of work, we build major projects ... some in remote camp sites. Some clients are insisting
that only vaccinated people will be allowed on site. This is real, and no one is stopping them from enforcing that "rule".

As you know, certain universities in Ontario have drawn the line and said only people that are double vaccinated will be
allowed on campus in person.

Anti-vaxxers can cry all they want about those kinds of rules, but until this is challenged and won at the Supreme Court (many
years from now) ... there's zero direction from the government, and in fact, government probably won't put any pressure on
these companies, as they WANT people to vaccinate.

So ... for sure there will be rules in place from one business to the next that will treat those vaccinated differently to those
unvaccinated.

What remains uncertain at this point is what threat is presented by the anti-vaxxers to those of us who've had our shots. One of the guys I shoot with has, for his own reasons, decided not to get vaccinated. He's diligent about social distancing, wearing a mask where it is required and isn't spreading wild rumours and fake news about the vaccine. I respect his decision and based on current information will continue to shoot with him.

[MikePal]

What remains uncertain at this point is what threat is presented by the anti-vaxxers to those of us who've had our shots. One of the guys I shoot with has, for his own reasons, decided not to get vaccinated. He's diligent about social distancing, wearing a mask where it is required and isn't spreading wild rumours and fake news about the vaccine. I respect his decision and based on current information will continue to shoot with him.

What I don't get is, why are those who have had both shots worried about getting the virus..lack of trust in the vaccine. ??

Data shows you might (rarely) get a Variant, well then the vaccines there are giving now are no good and we're back to square one. That is not an issue with those who didn't get the vaccine spreading it. It an issue with trying to stop a virus that will continue to mutate and made all vaccine's will be useless in time.

If you trust the science and are convinced you're safe being double vaccinated, then it doesn't matter what the rest of society is doing, you have no reason to fear those that didn't get vaccinated.

[impact]

Why should anyone who has ben vaccinated live in fear of others regardless of their inoculation status?
Your logic makes zero sense whatsoever! Do you truly believe that this will not be questioned and challenged?

A threat from the non vaccinated? MSM propaganda BS at its finest ....lol