-
April 26th, 2021, 03:56 AM
#141

Originally Posted by
DanO
After a whole year and ICUs filling I can't believe this debate still rages. Unbelievable!
One could say the same after watching a whole year of lie after lie and being clearly protected in answering to those lies.
The debate would be over if we're allowed to have an honest one.
Usually if you have to keep lying to protect your lies, you're either being paid or you're being played.
This nightmare needs to be woken up.
-
April 26th, 2021 03:56 AM
# ADS
-
April 26th, 2021, 07:23 AM
#142
Exactly! Lied to by politicians and MSM for over a year now and people are awake. Peaceful demonstration rallies everywhere and they still try to hide it. The only way they know how to bring in their Global Reset. It can't any good for the people if they continually have to lie in order to implement it.
-
April 26th, 2021, 07:59 PM
#143
So....there is little doubt that our village idiot has bumbled many things...BUT
are you (Impact & OneLess) suggesting that the Covid pandemic has been staged ?
“You have enemies ? Good. It means you have stood up for something, sometime in your life”: Winston Churchill
-
April 26th, 2021, 08:25 PM
#144

Originally Posted by
Gun Nut
It boils down then, to who is in the lawful position, so what body of law would supersede the other should determine that, shouldn't it? Maybe you could provide some explanation?
You stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun Nut.
The short answer would be, if the disruption or interference was as a result of a lawful act....like enforcing a law or regulation.
So, the section you posted would not be applicable.
“If you’re not a Liberal by twenty, you have no heart. If you’re not a Conservative by forty, you have no brain.”
-Winston Churchill
-
April 26th, 2021, 10:28 PM
#145

Originally Posted by
rick_iles
The short answer would be, if the disruption or interference was as a result of a lawful act....like enforcing a law or regulation.
So, the section you posted would not be applicable.
So in this case, the police were in a lawful position to act, in order to enforce COVID-19 restrictions, but chose not to?
You don't stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun Nut
-
April 27th, 2021, 03:49 AM
#146

Originally Posted by
73hunter
So....there is little doubt that our village idiot has bumbled many things...BUT
are you (Impact & OneLess) suggesting that the Covid pandemic has been staged ?
100%. There's armies of lawyers building a case as we speak.
When the evidence shows you deliberately hid how efficient therapeutics worked in preventing death's, you loose all credibility of your intentions.
The Nuremberg 2.0(covid) trials are coming and there's a shyteload of leaders on the list.
-
April 27th, 2021, 04:52 AM
#147
There is a question regarding if an EUA (emergency use authorization) for a vaccine can be issued if there are approved therapeutics. When you look into it, both sides get into the definitions of therapeutics and the word approved. It reminds me of the Bill Clinton trial and it depends on what the definition of "is" is
After looking into this you can see that there is an incentive for the pharmaceutical industry to suppress therapeutics like Hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin to facilitate the emergency rollout of the vaccines without proper clinical trials.
Last edited by Jakezilla; April 27th, 2021 at 05:06 AM.
OFAH, CSSA, NFA
-
April 27th, 2021, 05:21 AM
#148
That was an issue that the Republicans bought forward under Trump. He handled it poorly and wasn't able to push the question forward. Especially treatment like Ivermectin..that was being used successful as a last resort in 3rd world countries.
Yes this was all about pushing the vaccines from Big Pharma.
-
April 27th, 2021, 05:40 AM
#149

Originally Posted by
MikePal
Ts.
Yes this was all about pushing the vaccines from Big Pharma.
Meanwhile an EUs Official for Vaccine procurement is trying to explain the 4 mil Eu ,which showed up on her /husbands account...............
Last edited by gbk; April 28th, 2021 at 12:07 AM.
-
April 27th, 2021, 05:55 AM
#150

Originally Posted by
Gun Nut
So in this case, the police were in a lawful position to act, in order to enforce COVID-19 restrictions, but chose not to?
You don't stop hunting because you grow old. You grow old because you stop hunting.
- Gun Nut
Yes, to a degree. I’m sure they issued a warning, which apparently did no good. They found themselves in a lose, lose position, and using good discretion, backed out, Charges could always be laid at a later date, possibly with an Obstruct PO charge added in.
IMHO....
Last edited by rick_iles; April 27th, 2021 at 05:58 AM.
“If you’re not a Liberal by twenty, you have no heart. If you’re not a Conservative by forty, you have no brain.”
-Winston Churchill