Freedom of Speech takes a hit

[MikePal]

Here's an overview of parlor's lawsuit.
https://youtu.be/HFp5E7akgy8

Thanks..interesting arguments. He makes the case that this will 'winnable' in court.

[JBen]

Maybe you missed the last 4 years of many Republicans turning their back on trump. Your point doesnt demonstrate much when its be been an occurrence.

Shouldn’t that tell you something? You know, “Hello”.......

Regardless four years of it has little to do with “today”, and high ranking republicans supporting an impeachment, including McConnel. And that impeachment would be due to what?

Inciting violence?


Can you please try to stay somewhat on topic? And if your going to chirp, at least come up with something salient. Some kind of argument that either shows he wasn’t touching off a mob, or as Jakezilla did earlier.
”Even those that incite violence shouldn’t be muzzled”
At least he has some backbone to state his poisition and comprehension.

Look Oneless. Your the one that took a small statement which was used to illustrate “the point”. There was no direct comparison to them beyond that, no other supporting “arguments” to show more ( meaning atrocities, or more). “Inciting violence”

And you, yes you oh champion, also unwisely to used insults and pick a “fight” over it.

You are allowed to think differently, that he hasn’t been and didn’t. Stick that imo, your ability to poke holes outside of weak insults is, well frankly weak

[Jakezilla]

What do you do when your so called free speech incites violence, is it still alright then?

Pretty sure the courts have dealt with that.

[Jakezilla]

Oh and Jakezilla.


That's all it was designed to do. Get people to think about him. As I repeatedly said. "With the benefit of hindsight, should he have been muzzled".
People are free to think what they want. Some such as yourself, might decide. "Yes, no matter what it led to". Others might think about it and decide "Maybe there are situations, where prominent people/leaders" should be muzzled.

"Too each their own".
This is full of some comical irony.

Hitler did not create Nazi Germany the state of Germany after WWI created Hitler and Nazi Germany. Muzzle Hitler and someone else would have taken his spot. Ideas need to be in the open so they can be seen for what they are and debated. Muzzling leaders will not change the state, mindset, or underlying currents in their nations. Muzzling them may even escalate tensions.

[MikePal]

Muzzling leaders will not change the state, mindset, or underlying currents in their nations. Muzzling them may even escalate tensions.

Very astute observation...if they think getting rid of Trump will curb the 'right' they are in for rude awaking.

[JBen]

Quite possibly. Not inclined to argue it. Hitler is just an illustration of someone, who used, amongst other things. Propaganda and his “gift of gab” to sway minds. In his case, incite hatred and violence ( amongst other things).

But on that arguement. There are reasons he, he rose to such elevated heights. Lots has been written about it.

[MikePal]

Hitler did not create Nazi Germany the state of Germany after WWI created Hitler and Nazi Germany.

Few people even know that 'Nazi' is actually (in English) ..National Socialist Party. The exact road we're heading down with the Great Reset.

History will repeat itself...complete with internment camps, only they will be called 're-education centres (like in China)....we already saw that in Italy.

[JBen]

That’s one reason why, when Oneless went off, I included a short blurb about the “Nazi” party. It was a “socialist” party, that in fact championed the “working class”..and hitler played them like a fiddle. Lots has been written about this..

Hopefully no-one picks a bone over this next. That hated those shyster elites (Jews) taking $$ and more.

sound familiar?

[fishfood]

Reminds me of this song lol .

No handlebars

The power is real lol.

https://youtu.be/HLUX0y4EptA

Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

[MarkB]

First on the list is the fault of Trump for wanting the CEO arrested, our guys were collateral damage. Every possible means have been used to get their release.

All the others on the list existed during Conservative governments, why did they not care?

Why did Harper make trade deals with Communists?

I still don't see you providing evidence that Harper said he admired a dictatorship, just like Turdeau did. I suspect we will get only deflections from you now.

In terms of you're last question ... is your proposal to stop all trade with China?