Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 37

Thread: Fed Issue - Public interest in Mark Norman case is growing and C-68 (Land version)

  1. #21
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jaycee View Post
    It was announced yesterday that all his legal fees are being covered by the Fed. Gov. and I believe he is being reinstated to his former job.
    Do you think that they are now admitting to wrong doing?
    Not on your life, will they admit that! They'll try to bury this as deep as they can and convince J.Q. Public that there's nothing to see here? That they had no part of the process? Move along, we have an election to run?

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #22
    Leads by example

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I watched the full 32 minute press conference held my him and Marie H last night. Very informative and something everyone who has followed this case should watch.

    First thing out of her mouth was throwing Trudope under the bus haha, when introducing the legal team she said “Good thing Norman didn’t fire all the women he hired”,

    She’s a tigress, so impressive.
    “You have enemies ? Good. It means you have stood up for something, sometime in your life”: Winston Churchill

  4. #23
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    The opposition will NOT let that matter rest in Parliament. Erin O'Toole was hammering them,relentlessly,this morning. All the Justice Minister and the Defense Minister could do was obfuscate and deflect. It will definitely be a huge election issue.
    If a tree falls on your ex in the woods and nobody hears it,you should probably still get rid of your chainsaw. Just sayin'....

  5. #24
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    It should be but the public seems to have a very short memory when it comes to this stuff.. That's why I can't see the logic behind all the PC's anti lib ads that are running right now.

  6. #25
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sawbill View Post
    It should be but the public seems to have a very short memory when it comes to this stuff.. That's why I can't see the logic behind all the PC's anti lib ads that are running right now.
    I agree, but the Cons have to show they're on top of these issues, as it happens. The dust will eventually settle and then hopefully the dirt will be dug up again, in time to remind the public what the liberals are really about?
    It's becoming more and more like a circus each day the libs are in power.
    Last edited by Bushmoose; May 9th, 2019 at 01:02 PM.

  7. #26
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I'm just concerned that people who vote just to say they voted without actually getting into the real issues or don't follow a partys day to day shenanigans will become tired of hearing about the SNC lavolin controversy or the Norman case. Hope I'm wrong but I think they're the bulk of the voting public.

  8. #27
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by sawbill View Post
    I'm just concerned that people who vote just to say they voted without actually getting into the real issues or don't follow a partys day to day shenanigans will become tired of hearing about the SNC lavolin controversy or the Norman case. Hope I'm wrong but I think they're the bulk of the voting public.
    Most people don’t know who thier MP is let alone how they vote. There are more uninformed imbeciles with voter cards than you would believe. Don’t write a Trudough off. He has the media bought and paid for. It’s payback time for them.
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  9. #28
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by terrym View Post
    Most people don’t know who thier MP is let alone how they vote. There are more uninformed imbeciles with voter cards than you would believe. Don’t write a Trudough off. He has the media bought and paid for. It’s payback time for them.
    There should be a test to qualify to vote?
    It's really pathetic to hear people comment in the coffee shop or several of my neighbour's, on how badly they are unaware of the currents issues?
    I'm 63. I really shouldn't get this hyped up about it since I don't have any children that will be affected by the nonsense of the liberals. What happens in this countries future should be a moot point? But the bottom line is I can't stand the liberal party and what their philosophy is?

  10. #29
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Bushmoose View Post
    There should be a test to qualify to vote?
    Test????
    Trudough has changed the election laws so that all you need is a voter card. They can vote without photo ID or while wearing a Niqab. He lets them walk right into the country, puts them up in hotels, their kids go to school in Toronto and everything is on the house, dental included. Who do you think they will vote for? Trudough has no morals and no brains but hey, he’s a good looking boy right?
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  11. #30
    Leads by example

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Funny thing I'm hearing is that the reason for dropping the case was evidence which came from the Conservative Party. Yes they have been sitting on it all this time & letting Norman swing. But the politics of the case seemed better to let it continue as long as it was hurting the Liberals.




    _____________________________________
    Living proof that "beer builds better bellies".

Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •