Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 25 of 25

Thread: Now Wynne and gang want us to heat with hydro !!

  1. #21
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Electrical code allows for 48 Volt wiring systems without building permit
    Off the grid folks are being denied Occupancy Permit because the need to connected to power source for fire code
    Municipalities are requiring a 115V ECE system to be installed
    Wynne is looking at charging people who are off the grid, who have transmission lines on road side of property "delivery to you charges" because they have to maintain hydro infrastructure. Don't believe me, cottage users who are getting zero use bills with distribution charges added.
    The way forward is to buy a property with no transmission line in an unincorporated township it seems
    But that will go the way of water/septic charging proposed by City of Ottawa
    When does government intrusion end, where did our freedom of choice and rights go.
    I truly fear for my kids future.
    Mark Snow, Leader Of The, Ontario Libertarian Party

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #22
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    More on this idiocy from the financial post

    http://business.financialpost.com/fp...he-hell-out-of

  4. #23
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Good article.
    I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.

  5. #24
    Borderline Spammer

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by line052 View Post
    Wynne is looking at charging people who are off the grid, who have transmission lines on road side of property "delivery to you charges" because they have to maintain hydro infrastructure. Don't believe me, cottage users who are getting zero use bills with distribution charges added.
    Paying for future potential use? I can believe this - though I'd like to see proof.

    When the township my cousin lives in 'decided' to bring in water, everyone that fell within a 'prescribed area of service' had to cap their wells and start paying outrageous bills (well over $1K a year) for the 'convenience'. The point? Never underestimate what government can and will do.

  6. #25
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    The proof is cottage people who getting bills for zero, but still getting delivery to charges. When brought up by Patrick Brown (C), it became a liberal topic of "why are we not doing this"
    Quote Originally Posted by Wahoo View Post
    Paying for future potential use? I can believe this - though I'd like to see proof.

    When the township my cousin lives in 'decided' to bring in water, everyone that fell within a 'prescribed area of service' had to cap their wells and start paying outrageous bills (well over $1K a year) for the 'convenience'. The point? Never underestimate what government can and will do.
    Mark Snow, Leader Of The, Ontario Libertarian Party

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •