Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 21 to 23 of 23

Thread: Duffy

  1. #21
    Elite Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by werner.reiche View Post
    I think the judge really dropped the ball. His decision was based on the assertion that "poor judgement is not a crime". How is that different from a teen's poor judgement when he steals a car for a joyride? I guess that's not a crime either.
    Fair to say that despite the ruling by the judge, most would agree that wrong was done. I have to agree with you Werner, poor judgement as an excuse is no more valid than ignorance of the law. Something is wrong here.
    There is room for all God's creatures - right next to the mashed potatoes!

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #22
    Elite Member

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wahoo View Post
    From my limited reading of the decision, he also linked the poor judgement to the poorly written rules of the Senate.

    We (the Canadian taxpayer) are going to be presented with Duffy's legal bill and it will be substantial. This whole, sordid affair is far from over.
    And let's not forget he will probably sue the government for defamation ... who wins here?

  4. #23
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by MarkB View Post
    And let's not forget he will probably sue the government for defamation ... who wins here?
    The cynical answer is "the lawyers".

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •