-
March 25th, 2016, 08:37 AM
#151
Originally Posted by
trimmer21
The only possible way would be anecdotally,meaning,some available information,but,not enough to prosecute (as was my personal frustrating experience when investigating complaints). I'll just say that all the protestors aren't doing victims any favors,either. The witnesses lied and fabricated evidence which led to the acquital. Protestors position themselves that it doesn't matter,he's guilty,anyway. They all look foolish.
Exactly... It sure lessens their (protesters) credibility !!
-
March 25th, 2016 08:37 AM
# ADS
-
March 25th, 2016, 09:31 AM
#152
Being guilty and convicted are two different things. OJ anyone?
-
March 25th, 2016, 11:49 AM
#153
Originally Posted by
fishermccann
Being guilty and convicted are two different things. OJ anyone?
IIRC,that case was more about horrendous investigative techniques,prosecutorial errors in judgement and tunnel vision along with apparently colluded testimony. Note the similarities here?
-
March 25th, 2016, 12:13 PM
#154
How long before he's back on CBC radio???
-
March 25th, 2016, 12:46 PM
#155
Never , they likely had just cause for firing him due to workplace policy ,but maybe not enough to convict in a court of law, beyond reasonable doubt.
-
March 25th, 2016, 02:16 PM
#156
I agree, he is finished as a celebrity personality but I wouldn't be surprised if he sues the complainants to try and recover income lost due to defamation of character.Especially if the crown charges the 3 women with perjury and collusion, I think he would have a slam dunk case.
Last edited by Hunter John; March 25th, 2016 at 02:19 PM.
-
March 25th, 2016, 02:26 PM
#157
Originally Posted by
Hunter John
I agree, he is finished as a celebrity personality but I wouldn't be surprised if he sues the complainants to try and recover income lost due to defamation of character.Especially if the crown charges the 3 women with perjury and collusion, I think he would have a slam dunk case.
There's a strong possibity that his lawyer has advised against a lawsuit in civil court. Because the rules of evidence and burden of proof are different,he may find himself on the losing end and have costs awarded to the defendants. That would break the bank and their lawyers would make damn sure of it.
-
March 25th, 2016, 02:48 PM
#158
Originally Posted by
Hunter John
I agree, he is finished as a celebrity personality but I wouldn't be surprised if he sues the complainants to try and recover income lost due to defamation of character.Especially if the crown charges the 3 women with perjury and collusion, I think he would have a slam dunk case.
May not be finished as a celebrity personality.
Remember Kobi bryant , Mike Tyson , Frank D'Angelo.
The general public either has a short memory or a low IQ.
Reply With Quote
