-
November 22nd, 2015, 08:58 AM
#11
Originally Posted by
waltman
If the pond is on private property does "Buddy" not have control over what happens to it? If its public property or part of a watershed that flows through you might have a case. Correct me if I'm wrong please.
That's correct. As long as the pond is on his property and not connected to any watercourse flowing through,then,he may do with it as he pleases. I suspect this may be the case and he likely has permits. That would answer why Standups calls have been ignored.
-
November 22nd, 2015 08:58 AM
# ADS
-
November 22nd, 2015, 10:44 AM
#12
Not defending MNR but we finally had a visit in order to discuss issues. The CO arrived well "late" to the party, yet had all the current info except for some events immediately before he arrived.
That may be the case but if it is a situation that can't wait any longer I'd do as others suggest.
-
November 22nd, 2015, 11:58 AM
#13
Has too much time on their hands
Could be he has permits. We have dug out many old farm ponds over the years .many of them are full of gold fish . Dutch
-
November 22nd, 2015, 03:46 PM
#14
Legal or not they still have an obligation to get back to the complainant in a decent amount of time with an update on whats going on.
-
November 22nd, 2015, 03:47 PM
#15
Has too much time on their hands
Originally Posted by
sawbill
Legal or not they still have an obligation to get back to the complainant in a decent amount of time with an update on whats going on.
Agree 100%
-
November 22nd, 2015, 03:53 PM
#16
Has too much time on their hands
Originally Posted by
pand
Give your local conservation authority a call. See what they can do
http://www.rvca.ca/ if you're in ottawa
Yes the Conservation Authority may have been informed all along.