-
November 4th, 2015, 12:52 PM
#1
Trudeau's cabinet
-
November 4th, 2015 12:52 PM
# ADS
-
November 4th, 2015, 02:16 PM
#2
Man,that's quite the collection of nobodys,isn't it?
-
November 4th, 2015, 02:47 PM
#3
I for one am glad Leslie did not get defense. He was shunned from being CDS for a reason, he is an elitist officer with a false sense of self being, he would have been the downfall of the CAF. Do the research, he too his wife's family name, because it was better aligned with military history. F$#king bull cr@# . I do however have respect with the current Chief of Defense. A Reservist, a Policemen, and a realist.
-
November 4th, 2015, 06:12 PM
#4
Essentially the most important portfolio - Transportation - went into good hands.
Garneau is smart, Savvy in several areas of transportation, connected in that industry, and one helluva stand up guy.
Had the Libs made him party leader, I would have considered voting red.
About 80% of the rest of the appointments are jokes and drivel though. This should be an entertaining 4 yrs.
-
November 4th, 2015, 07:20 PM
#5
Heavily stacked with GTA Liberals..rewarded?
In the end appointments have never (or rarely) been about merit, so.....Maybe the question people might want to ask JT is why of his 184 seats, only 50 women to begin with.....
-
November 4th, 2015, 07:25 PM
#6
Originally Posted by
JBen
Heavily stacked with GTA Liberals..rewarded?
In the end appointments have never (or rarely) been about merit, so.....Maybe the question people might want to ask JT is why of his 184 seats, only 50 women to begin with.....
.........and every one of them has no experience in their prospective portfolios nor,in one case,been in this country for more than ten years. All these appointments were politically correct choices to show that the Liberal Party under Trudeau is truly "progressive" and to shut up the special interests. It'll be intersting to see what the rest of Canada thinks about cabinet being "made in Toronto".
Last edited by trimmer21; November 4th, 2015 at 07:26 PM.
Reason: sp
-
November 4th, 2015, 08:20 PM
#7
I agree Mott. Garneau is a good choice for that portfolo but the skeptic in me says that was a reward for him stepping out of the leadership race. Time will tell.
-
November 5th, 2015, 12:56 AM
#8
Did you see who is the minister of defense is????
-
November 5th, 2015, 05:45 AM
#9
Did anyone read his story, back ground or are we just judging book by their covers? You should see of picture of him in his field dress while in the field, boots on the ground, risking it all.
He has quite a back ground.
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/ca...reality-of-war
Peter Mackay?
Last edited by JBen; November 5th, 2015 at 05:50 AM.
-
November 5th, 2015, 08:19 AM
#10
Originally Posted by
JBen
Did anyone read his story, back ground or are we just judging book by their covers? You should see of picture of him in his field dress while in the field, boots on the ground, risking it all.
He has quite a back ground.
http://news.nationalpost.com/news/ca...reality-of-war
Peter Mackay?
Yes, I think this guy should do well. At least he "has been there"....time will tell. Thankfully, Blair has been shut out.....at least for now !!
Reply With Quote
