Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 16 of 16

Thread: Which land hold more Moose .....

  1. #11
    Has all the answers

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Thanks
    Good points...

    Quote Originally Posted by Gilroy View Post
    I would say the total wilderness and it would stand to reason this would be the case.

    Logging has no doubt created many areas for the Moose to feed but they come with a heavy price?

    Roads that are created allow for more predation by hunters using none traditional means to access a lot of territory that protected the Moose back in the day.

    The same roads allow for four legged hunters to travel much more area in search of Moose.

    Opening up areas by logging such as in Algonquin Park area and surrounding areas allowed for the northward expansion of Deer with the spread of Brain Worm killing of more Moose.

    So I would go the for total wilderness area, they were renewed by much smaller natural forest fires caused by nature, so there has always been feed plots.

    There is some talk that aboriginal peoples actually managed the land using fire for various reasons, this could have been one of them.

    Truly wilderness areas in this Province where hunters had to go by traditional means without the logging roads, would in my opinion see a dramatic reduction in Moose harvest.

    In a total wilderness state I believe even after smaller natural forest fires, more of the dense shelter areas would have been preserved.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #12
    Post-a-holic

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I hunted the same area since 1972 before any logging was there. This year they just clearcut a stand of black spruce that once burnt in the 1920's and it never held many moose there. Every other part of bush l hunted has been now logged. Moose now don't have far to go to find what they need or want. Over the years l found one spot that held a lot of moose and it was during the rut. It was a wet tag alder mess where there was cover, water, food, wet ground that was easy to find/dig wallows and lots of tags to clean velvet off antlers. The spot is near the black spruce logging that is the only place l will bow hunt if l get a tag and the logging had no effect to it.
    Experience is what you gain when you didn't get what you wanted.

    Many are called but only a few are chosen.

  4. #13
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alfoldivandor View Post
    I know that .
    But that is not my question ...
    In a mature undisputed forest, there would be fewer moose compared to mature forests adjacent to disturbed areas.
    A true sportsman counts his achievements in proportion to the effort involved and the fairness of the sport. - S. Pope

  5. #14
    Has all the answers

    User Info Menu

    Default

    I agree with that ,
    but what about predators using the logging roads and having easier excess to hunt the Moose in that area.
    And don’t forget the two legged predators are there to.
    I am just wondering is it worth the fly in wilderness Moose hunt…!?

    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Menard View Post
    In a mature undisputed forest, there would be fewer moose compared to mature forests adjacent to disturbed areas.

  6. #15
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alfoldivandor View Post
    If there would be no human in the wilderness no logging there would be less moose in that area ...?
    Because less new grow no burn down area .
    Comes down to two words:

    Habitat (landscape suitable for moose)and carrying capacity of the land(food available 24 / 7-365).
    The better the two-the more the moose .

    Predation does not help-hunting also does not help moose numbers.
    The amount of moose taken out from an area by :natural means(disease-old age and accidents)is most likely always at "historical level" = consistent.
    Predation and hunting varies greatly from one area to another.

    Alaska comes to mind-harsh weather,but suitable habitat and the land has wast carrying capacity.
    Until human "invasion" there was moose everywhere, despite natural causes and predation .
    Not so much anymore.Plenty-but not near close to what it used to be.
    Last edited by gbk; October 29th, 2024 at 10:39 PM.

  7. #16
    Needs a new keyboard

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by alfoldivandor View Post
    I am just wondering is it worth the fly in wilderness Moose hunt…!?
    A fly-in moose hunt with the right outfitter and right location could be the hunt of a lifetime. As with most other things in life, there are no guarantees. You can be in a great place, but sometimes the moose just don’t cooperate.

    Fly-in hunts can be wonderful experiences and they normally happen during the rut so there’s a good chance that a big bull will respond very positively.

    You have to do your research and understand that some outfitters are really good liars and will promise you everything to get you to book. The good outfitters are often booked several years out.

    If I could afford it, I’d love to go up to the Yukon (once) and try for a trophy bull. I’d also like to do an elk hunt. Maybe when I win the lotto! Lol
    A true sportsman counts his achievements in proportion to the effort involved and the fairness of the sport. - S. Pope

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •