Trudeau calls for clearing cyberspace of hate, disinformation

[fishfood]

If I could make any sense of wtf you are talking about I’d gladly respond.

Well what is considered fake news ?

How often do you find yourself in the FDA CDC or government links?

You know accually looking at the document's presented?

Not just saying what the trusted BBC News tells you. They are being paid by big pharma . Big pharma is not on your side they on the Proffitt side.

Digging deep into these documents will help you more then the paid media telling you is good or not. The Media only gives what they want to give .




Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

[Cameracutter]

Well what is considered fake news ?

How often do you find yourself in the FDA CDC or government links?

You know accually looking at the document's presented?

Not just saying what the trusted BBC News tells you. They are being paid by big pharma . Big pharma is not on your side they on the Proffitt side.

Digging deep into these documents will help you more then the paid media telling you is good or not. The Media only gives what they want to give .




Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

The topic is “…clearing cyberspace of hate, disinformation.” I’m to understand the BBC and other who for argument sake would be MSM, are being paid and therefor not to be trusted? But the agenda driven conspirators spewing the narrative that fits there bias, and furthers their agenda, who don’t follow any journalist practices or norms are the ones you believe? I read my fare share of documents, so don’t worry about me thanks.

My comment on the original post simply stated that the Echo Chamber here is in no danger. It’s a bastion of misleading, half truths, down right lies, libellous swill that I find entertaining in its outrageous claims.

So I wouldn’t be worried about it. Your happy place to exchange the bizarre things found in the rabbit hole of the interweb will be here for years to come.

[canadaman30]

The topic is “…clearing cyberspace of hate, disinformation.” I’m to understand the BBC and other who for argument sake would be MSM, are being paid and therefor not to be trusted? But the agenda driven conspirators spewing the narrative that fits there bias, and furthers their agenda, who don’t follow any journalist practices or norms are the ones you believe? I read my fare share of documents, so don’t worry about me thanks.

My comment on the original post simply stated that the Echo Chamber here is in no danger. It’s a bastion of misleading, half truths, down right lies, libellous swill that I find entertaining in its outrageous claims.

So I wouldn’t be worried about it. Your happy place to exchange the bizarre things found in the rabbit hole of the interweb will be here for years to come.

More fake news..lol
https://brightlightnews.com/49-of-b-...ly-vaccinated/

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...rippling-heart

https://www.thecountersignal.com/new...vid-propaganda

https://thenationaltelegraph.com/reg...u-bed-capacity

Then there were those saying the need for booster shots is just more conspiracy theorist misleading misinformation...say it ain't so...lol

[Cameracutter]

More fake news..lol
https://brightlightnews.com/49-of-b-...ly-vaccinated/

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/...rippling-heart

https://www.thecountersignal.com/new...vid-propaganda

https://thenationaltelegraph.com/reg...u-bed-capacity

Then there were those saying the need for booster shots is just more conspiracy theorist misleading misinformation...say it ain't so...lol

Perfectly timed and proving my point. Your “space” is safe. Carry on. And I’m sure you can follow up with some kind of meme to claim some outlandish statement that has no factual basis and take this thread further off it’s original point. I’d be disappointed if you didn’t.

[canadaman30]

Perfectly timed and proving my point. Your “space” is safe. Carry on. And I’m sure you can follow up with some kind of meme to claim some outlandish statement that has no factual basis and take this thread further off it’s original point. I’d be disappointed if you didn’t.

What posted is misinformation?....lmao.
FB_IMG_1636759684681.jpg

FB_IMG_1635567131636.jpg

[Cameracutter]

What posted is misinformation?....lmao.
FB_IMG_1636759684681.jpg

FB_IMG_1635567131636.jpg

Thanks for not disappointing.

[canadaman30]

Thanks for not disappointing.

Cheers
FB_IMG_1636136750866.jpg
FB_IMG_1635405150285.jpg

[fishfood]

The topic is “…clearing cyberspace of hate, disinformation.” I’m to understand the BBC and other who for argument sake would be MSM, are being paid and therefor not to be trusted? But the agenda driven conspirators spewing the narrative that fits there bias, and furthers their agenda, who don’t follow any journalist practices or norms are the ones you believe? I read my fare share of documents, so don’t worry about me thanks.

My comment on the original post simply stated that the Echo Chamber here is in no danger. It’s a bastion of misleading, half truths, down right lies, libellous swill that I find entertaining in its outrageous claims.

So I wouldn’t be worried about it. Your happy place to exchange the bizarre things found in the rabbit hole of the interweb will be here for years to come.

Yeah but clearly it mentions in the article and about mis information about vaccines and the pandemic.

Most times I pay attention to both sides see I'm not for one side or the other. I would rather the truth. One side just tells another side of the story but both have some false or misleading information.

Who do you believe now a days ?

Why are We pushing experiments on a group that has a 99.9 survival rate ? Our government can't tell us if covid effects are 1 in 3 thousand or 1 in [emoji817] thousand in the younger group.




Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

[mosquito]

Yeah but clearly it mentions in the article and about mis information about vaccines and the pandemic.

Most times I pay attention to both sides see I'm not for one side or the other. I would rather the truth. One side just tells another side of the story but both have some false or misleading information.

Who do you believe now a days ?

Why are We pushing experiments on a group that has a 99.9 survival rate ? Our government can't tell us if covid effects are 1 in 3 thousand or 1 in [emoji817] thousand in the younger group.




Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk

Well you sure can't believe the Liberals, their constant lies, secrets and coverups make them clearly the worst government in Canadian history and their treatment of firearm owners, vets, Indigenous, the West and even minorities like Celina C.G and Jody W.R. in their party as well as the doubling of a deficit that took 150 years to make shows them by far to be a disaster, but hey their minions as just like Stalin, Mao, Hitler, Al Capone, Castro etc. following and blind dedication. Lies, intimidation, incompetence, secrecy... sad some are so blind or care so little about Canada's future.

https://tnc.news/2021/04/25/ten-time...isinformation/

The Liberals were even pointed out for their misinformation by CBC, I was quite surprised to see even CBC acknowledge that Trudeau came out, lied to Canadians, CBC would spread it and later "some bureaucrat would correct it quietly later with no news coverage". But then the Libs said CBC was having a hard time and needed more money and openness and disclosure of facts went away again.

"Wilson-Raybould says she's mad at herself now for having once thought Trudeau is an 'honest and good person, when, in truth, he would so casually lie to the public' "



As for why they are pushing it so hard... because in both Justlied and Freelands own words, it is an opportunity, to grab power, spend, change society to blindly follow them, that seems their goals. The old power corrupts... well the Libs were already corrupt based on the ethics violations etc. so it the opportunity just made them worse

https://www.facebook.com/22094237507...97595810336157