-
September 7th, 2021, 09:49 AM
#31
Has too much time on their hands
Well we already have proof that voting PPC cost the CPC seats in the last election by just looking at the numbers. So... simply put a vote for ANYONE but the CPC in THIS election will guarantee a Liberal win.
Thinking takes some effort for some... but don't worry your votes will fix that and with their win the Libs will do that for you with their censorship bills and paid for media.
Ian Runkle covers what is waiting with a Lib win, more bills that will affect all firearm owners and censorship and not in his video there is another $400M to CBC and if they keep the promises $78B+ in new spending. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0qD51ZASl0
New 2023 poster... or vote CPC that has a hope of winning. CPC might listen to firearm owners, Libs don't
-
September 7th, 2021 09:49 AM
# ADS
-
September 7th, 2021, 10:13 AM
#32
I think you nailed it when you said "might" but I'm not holding my breathe after watching O'toole walk back on key issues this weekend. Again what is the difference between Cons under O'toole and Libs. It might be time to reverse your thinking and vote some of the corruption out of Ottawa, even if Libs do pull off the election there is always the option to arrest the Turd, not so much for Erin ...yet.
-
September 8th, 2021, 06:28 AM
#33
Mr. Flip-Flop O'Toole.....
"First O’Toole promised to end the Liberals’ carbon tax. Then he was advised that might cost him support among “progressive” voters. So, he brought in his own carbon tax, called it a “levy” and hoped no one would notice the similarity."
"Now he’s following the same approach on guns."
"At first, O’Toole promised to repeal the Liberals’ 2020 gun ban that outlawed somewhere between 250,000 and 400,000 guns in the hands of at least 100,000 law-abiding duck hunters, farmers, sport shooters and collectors just because the guns were scary looking."
"His position was entirely defensible. Law-abiding gun owners aren’t the cause of rising gun violence. Criminals who steal or smuggle guns are the problem. And the Liberal ban doesn’t go after criminals."
"But rather than explain the uselessness of the Trudeau ban in combatting crime, O’Toole has melted in the face of Liberal smears and harsh social media comments."
"Now he claims he would keep the Liberal ban, yet study the wisdom of declassifying certain models covered by the Liberals’ order-in-council."
"(That’s another problem with this law. It wasn’t debated and passed in the House of Commons. It was simply pencil-whipped into force by the Trudeau cabinet.)"
"But now that O’Toole has pulled a 180 on guns similar to the one he pulled on carbon taxes, how do conservative voters trust him?"
"The decision to keep the gun ban is almost as damaging to his credibility as his about-face on carbon tax."
https://ottawasun.com/opinion/column...7-939326f5f857
-
September 12th, 2021, 10:36 AM
#34
Who would you propose voting for, Libertarian are only running in 12 seats so not a chance in hell of forming a government.
PPC cannot get elected as they will not get the swing votes.
So your choice is NDP, Liberal or Conservative.

Originally Posted by
WillieBeno
I think you nailed it when you said "might" but I'm not holding my breathe after watching O'toole walk back on key issues this weekend. Again what is the difference between Cons under O'toole and Libs. It might be time to reverse your thinking and vote some of the corruption out of Ottawa, even if Libs do pull off the election there is always the option to arrest the Turd, not so much for Erin ...yet.
"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
September 12th, 2021, 10:37 AM
#35
I want to add Trudeau has already admitted he intends to ban handguns and possible more rifles.
"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
September 12th, 2021, 05:11 PM
#36
Let him ban them all lol.
Sent from my CLT-L04 using Tapatalk
-
September 13th, 2021, 01:13 PM
#37
Has too much time on their hands
So .... do you think Bill is right about the O'toole changes.... or is it just lies and he is more afraid of the law abiding than criminals?

Originally Posted by
mosquito
Bill Blair lying again. What a piece of .... well sh** has uses..... toxic waste.... that fits... What a piece of toxic waste.
https://twitter.com/BillBlair/status...49761726529536
Bill Blair
@BillBlair
It’s not only assault rifles that Erin O’Toole wants to legalize. His promises to the gun lobby will bring in thousands of guns that have never been legal in Canada, like concealable pistols, combat shotguns, and anti-material rifles.
If his lies get pointed out (he doesn't seem to care) I have included a picture.
Attachment 42202
The Liberal's attack lies.... ad I mean.
https://twitter.com/liberal_party/st...17459579494403
Liberal Party
@liberal_party
Canadians have a clear choice: let Erin O’Toole take us backward by legalizing assault weapons and putting these dangerous guns back on our streets, or move forward with a real plan to keep our communities safe. #ForwardForEveryone
Then another toxic pile of fear mongering/lies.
https://twitter.com/BillBlair/status...515971/photo/1
Pistols previously banned for their small size and concealability would also become available for purchase, like derringers and pocket pistols. Examples: Ruger LCP, Beretta Pico, RM380, DoubleTap
Semi-auto versions of small machine pistols would become legal for purchase. These have never been legal in Canada before. Examples: TEC-9, MAC-10, Uzi Pro, Steyr SPP
Bill Blair @BillBlair
·
Sep 11
In short, Erin O’Toole’s planned overhaul would:
Increase the availability of assault weapons
Introduce thousands of previously banned guns to the Canadian market
Remove RCMP traceability of tens of thousands of guns
Meet the demands of Canada’s gun lobbyists
https://www.oodmag.com/community/sho...=1#post1171954
Last edited by mosquito; September 13th, 2021 at 01:17 PM.
-
September 13th, 2021, 03:45 PM
#38
I know when talking politics it can get heated however keep it civil please and directly on topic.
Time in the outdoors is never wasted
-
September 13th, 2021, 06:44 PM
#39
There are many on here voting PPC to pretend they are against Trudeau but in reality they know they are hoping to elect him.

Originally Posted by
mosquito
Well we already have proof that voting PPC cost the CPC seats in the last election by just looking at the numbers. So... simply put a vote for ANYONE but the CPC in THIS election will guarantee a Liberal win.
Thinking takes some effort for some... but don't worry your votes will fix that and with their win the Libs will do that for you with their censorship bills and paid for media.
Ian Runkle covers what is waiting with a Lib win, more bills that will affect all firearm owners and censorship and not in his video there is another $400M to CBC and if they keep the promises $78B+ in new spending.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y0qD51ZASl0
New 2023 poster... or vote CPC that has a hope of winning. CPC might listen to firearm owners, Libs don't

"This is about unenforceable registration of weapons that violates the rights of people to own firearms."—Premier Ralph Klein (Alberta)Calgary Herald, 1998 October 9 (November 1, 1942 – March 29, 2013) OFAH Member
-
September 13th, 2021, 08:07 PM
#40
Has too much time on their hands

Originally Posted by
greatwhite
There are many on here voting PPC to pretend they are against Trudeau but in reality they know they are hoping to elect him.
Pretty much. When you look at Bill "ban em all" Blair starts saying the O'Toole is going to legalize SMGs and grenade launchers etc. you know they are preaching to the ignorant and confused but that fear mongering will get them votes and CPC needs all the votes it can get to win with the Media, Lefties and PPC working against it. Say good bye to anything that uses a clip or magazine based on the Lib policies (see Ian Runkle / lawyer thread).