-
October 29th, 2018, 07:17 PM
#1
Has too much time on their hands
Fed Issue #84 - Stat Can. - personal transaction data of 500,000 people without their consent.
Trudeau defends Statistics Canada move to collect banking info of 500,000 Canadians
https://globalnews.ca/news/4608105/t...000-canadians/
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is defending a decision by Statistics Canada to compel banks and financial institutions to release the personal transaction data of 500,000 people without their consent.
Conservative House Leader Candice Bergen grilled Trudeau during question period Monday following a report by Global News that revealed Statistics Canada is asking the country’s nine largest banks for the transaction data of 500,000 randomly chosen Canadians, including everything from bill payments to cash withdrawals from ATMs to credit card payments and even account balances.
RANDOM.....???? Purpose ....????? Privacy .... ??? .... anyone believe Justlied Trudeau anymore?
Last edited by mosquito; October 29th, 2018 at 07:29 PM.
-
October 29th, 2018 07:17 PM
# ADS
-
October 29th, 2018, 10:51 PM
#2
Anonymous? Yeah,right. Liberals compiling private information like that sieve of a long gun registry that turned out to be a shopping list for thieves.. Gee,what could possibly go wrong?
-
October 30th, 2018, 07:37 AM
#3
Don’t recall seeing this mentioned in the Star? Hhhmmmm....
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
-
October 30th, 2018, 07:54 AM
#4
Without consent. Not true. Read your fine print of your banking disclosure agreements. It states directly in all of them that they may share your banking information with third parties. You’ve already consented by signing on the dotted line and opening an account with them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
October 30th, 2018, 12:26 PM
#5
Originally Posted by
Goosesniper
Without consent. Not true. Read your fine print of your banking disclosure agreements. It states directly in all of them that they may share your banking information with third parties. You’ve already consented by signing on the dotted line and opening an account with them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hold on ... first, I believe they put the purpose of sharing into context ... for credit approvals, etc. They cannot just free hand info to anyone. Second, we have laws that over-ride ANY terms and conditions sent out, and the right to privacy is a constitutional right ... no one can over-ride that right. So if it is proven that there was no good reason to share the data, and it infringed on someone's constitutional right, I think a class action law suit may be in order. I am not a lawyer, but I do read and negotiate contracts ... I would like to hear from a lawyer on this one.
-
October 30th, 2018, 08:43 PM
#6
Has too much time on their hands
It was anonymous ... after they got it apparently ... (wonder if it is like the Gun registry data handling ....)
and this new item is not anonymous data apparently...
StatCan scooped up 15 years of personal financial data from Canadian credit bureau
https://globalnews.ca/news/4610259/s...B4g7BoeVPzfaXw
... and Justlied thinks it is the gov'ts right to see all the banking infor and credit bureau data ..... Brian Lilley talking about it ...
https://www.facebook.com/brianlilley...5814121403525/
Including 800 pages of data breaches of gov't data .... socialist dictatorship is what they want I am more and more convinced!
-
October 30th, 2018, 08:56 PM
#7
The boy blunder was pretty clear when he said he admired the Chinese dictatorship and its well known his father lusted for that system too. If you ever wondered if the liberals were corrupt, there you go. The government can’t even manage a payroll system. Do you want the same imbeciles to have access to your financial records?
I’m suspicious of people who don't like dogs, but I trust a dog who doesn't like a person.
Reply With Quote
