Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 11 to 20 of 20

Thread: Khill not guilty in fatal shooting of First Nations man

  1. #11
    Has too much time on their hands

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rick_iles View Post
    Not likely since the “defendant” is dead. They could name his estate.....but.....
    I thought I inferred that. I suppose that I should have stated it. I guess the heat has already started to get to me.
    Last edited by Dythbringer; June 29th, 2018 at 09:12 AM.

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement
    ADVERTISEMENT
     

  3. #12
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Criminal charge sure, but I would rather pay any amount of money ,than go to jail , for anything, let alone murder.

  4. #13
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    Criminal charge sure, but I would rather pay any amount of money ,than go to jail , for anything, let alone murder.
    Why would you use the word "murder"? He didnt' murder anyone? He was found not guilty of any crime. There was no crime committed?

  5. #14
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Well he was not charged with j-walking. I meant, would you not pay any amount of cash rather than jail time, for anything? So a civil suit, is not remotely close, to the damage jail would cause any defendant. That's all I meant , don't try to cause trouble. LOL.
    Last edited by fishermccann; June 29th, 2018 at 11:25 AM.

  6. #15
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fishermccann View Post
    Well he was not charged with j-walking. I meant, would you not pay any amount of cash rather than jail time, for anything? So a civil suit, is not remotely close, to the damage jail would cause any defendant. That's all I meant , don't try to cause trouble. LOL.
    Ya ok. It's too damn hot to cause trouble today. have a great weekend!

  7. #16
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by delmer View Post
    Apparently a civil law suit is now being launched against Khill.

    https://globalnews.ca/news/4303645/p...urder-lawsuit/
    That lawsuit will never see the light of day. They're likely looking for an out-of-court payday. This isn't the US where even if someone is found "not guilty",they can still be sued into oblivion. Although strange things happen sometimes,our civil law system is light years different than America's.

  8. #17
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    The problem with a civil lawsuit is that many times the party being sued is bankrupted, for something that was never their fault to begin with.
    For Example.
    DRUNK DRIVER hits the light post at the end of the driveway. Driver is killed after the car rolls into the six to ten foot ditch, but the driver's Family sues me because of the light post. A person made a bad decision and got killed, but somehow it is my fault. After I have payed out hundreds of thousands in court and lawyer fees, I win. Sure I won, but no I didn't because now I am divorced, unemployed, in bankruptcy, and living in a welfare apartment because I had to sell my house, my truck and cash in my RRSP.
    Take the warning labels off. Darwin will solve the problem.

  9. #18
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default

    A good argument could be made that Canada is worse than the US. It doesn't seem as bad because they are a country of 300 million, where as Canada is 36 million. So if theres "one" frivolous and ridiculous civil suit, per 10 million people per year.

    The US media gets 30 cases per year to cash in on
    The CDn media gets 3

    Why is there a good argument that it's worse here?
    Because we are left of centre and bleeding hearts.

    Last year, the owner of an auto body shop was sued by the mother of a teen who.
    Was given alcohol by the mother
    Went out looking for fun at 1am with his friend
    Broke into the shops yard.
    Stole a car from the owners yard, crashed and died.
    The owner was found partially liable because he left the keys in the car.

    Then theres cases like this.
    https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/driver...lled-1.1793813

    Would you rather pay someone 10s, or hundreds of thousands to settle out of court. Or pay lawyers, engineers ( scene reconstruction experts), forensic experts, private investigators, and more 10s or hundreds of thousands

    To roll the dice in court.

  10. #19
    Member for Life

    User Info Menu

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LoR View Post
    A good argument could be made that Canada is worse than the US. It doesn't seem as bad because they are a country of 300 million, where as Canada is 36 million. So if theres "one" frivolous and ridiculous civil suit, per 10 million people per year.

    The US media gets 30 cases per year to cash in on
    The CDn media gets 3

    Why is there a good argument that it's worse here?
    Because we are left of centre and bleeding hearts.

    Last year, the owner of an auto body shop was sued by the mother of a teen who.
    Was given alcohol by the mother
    Went out looking for fun at 1am with his friend
    Broke into the shops yard.
    Stole a car from the owners yard, crashed and died.
    The owner was found partially liable because he left the keys in the car.


    Then theres cases like this.
    https://www.ctvnews.ca/canada/driver...lled-1.1793813

    Would you rather pay someone 10s, or hundreds of thousands to settle out of court. Or pay lawyers, engineers ( scene reconstruction experts), forensic experts, private investigators, and more 10s or hundreds of thousands

    To roll the dice in court.
    Re the above , body shop owner not responsible , Supreme Court ruling ;
    http://bensonpercival.com/case-summa...ge-sales-v-jj/

  11. #20
    Getting the hang of it

    User Info Menu

    Default

    That’s recent .

    Good in that they felt it wasn’t foreseeable. Bad in that they reaffirmed our countries bleeding heart default position.

    In reaching its conclusion the Supreme Court reaffirmed that the Plaintiff’s criminal conduct was irrelevant in analyzing whether a duty of care existed. As found in the Court’s previous judgments, the Court held that a Plaintiff engaging in immoral or illegal conduct is not precluded from successfully claiming against tortfeasors. Such behaviour can, however, form a part of the contributory negligence analysis.
    Most people sail through life without one or some of life’s larger curveballs being tossed their way...think it will never happen to them.

    Until it does.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •