And who is paying for all these cases??
Lmaso [emoji1787][emoji848].
Surely it not them paying for it maybe some of them are lol.
Sent from my SM-G960W using Tapatalk
Printable View
Any proof of that statement, or is it, just your opinion? Did you see the history of the people who died in the plane that was shot down. Almost all, were immigrants to Canada. Did you see all the Doctors, professors, Phd's ,scientists, and people with post graduate education on that plane,? They were the kind of people that Canada needs. The kind of people the world needs...... Or would you say...'not'.... because they were Muslim?
I was referring to the cost per person in Canada. True not all 36 million people in Canada work; however, simply working doesn't make one a tax payer. Sales taxes are paid by all for instance and that is based on consumption with parents paying the taxes for what their children consume and that money can't be dismissed. Unless you can tell me where every penny of the taxes go, I think splitting the cost across the entire population is the simplest way to see how much a refugee costs a person in Canada.
Taking in legit refugees is the right thing to do. Letting people in dragging designer luggage and carrying cell phones is not the right thing to do. There are millions of truly desperate people who have nothing but the tattered clothes on their backs and can’t feed themselves. The opportunists don’t come anywhere near that level of need. But, they will vote for Trudough as soon as they get a voter card. So, stack the voter pool. Control/pay off the media. Give millions of borrowed money to large corporations who are extremely profitable? Then claim they can’t afford to help the veterans? Unreal.
Alot of what you are speaking about is muddling actual refugees with economic asylum seekers (or illegal immigrants). These are two different problems but if you mash them up, the numbers of course go up.
My point is the cost of helping a refugee, an honest-to-god refugee as defined by most ration people, is neither financially crippling as some think nor they are not easy street getting loads of money.
I agree. We can dissect and debate the governments policies and decision without tearing down refugees. The Syrian refugees from 2016 were legit. The asylum seekers which actually drove up much of the cost weren't as far as I am concern and are a separate issue. But it seems some folks don't want to make a distinction between the two.
For me, as I stated before I usually vote Conservative because I want the government to live within its means, I don't have an issue paying to help a refugee who has nothing (I am not being literal here, most people these days have clothes and cell phones and the image of a refugee in tattered clothes is something which happened in a different time and isn't usually the way it happens) to get settled and integrated as fast as possible. It is the decent and right thing to do.
Seems you don't want to accept the truth of the costs associated with refugees. Yes the facts are from Canadian sources of just refugee costs. You may think it's the right thing to do but others that are working tax payers may feel bringing in more people to drive our countries deficit billions deeper into the hole is not the right thing to do.