Any Shocking News?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rick_iles

Because there is no truth to be ensured !! Better question is why did he resign, if he did no wrong ?? I figured he would throw himself on his sword to protect the village idiot !! Instead, it would appear he is just throwing JWR under the bus!!!

---

JWR flattened and properly discarded of, tire prints and all, then it opens the door for Butts coming back in a different title, ambassador, consultant ..... remember this is the guy that felt that laughing at Justlied's idiocy made you a Nazi .... while to me it seemed he actually acted like a real National Socialist ..... just remember it was JWR in her testimony that specifically said that Butt's didn't like the law in question.... no, truth and his goals .... any bet there is an email accident where they all get deleted if this gets pushed more?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by rick_iles

Because there is no truth to be ensured !! Better question is why did he resign, if he did no wrong ?? I figured he would throw himself on his sword to protect the village idiot !! Instead, it would appear he is just throwing JWR under the bus!!!

---

Why wouldn't he try to throw JWR under the bus? That is what they have been doing all along and what a wonderful job they have been doing about it, no blow back at all. Might as well keep the Titanic on course......

In true Orwellian style Butthead would have us believe 2+2=5. Sadly the proletarians will believe it.

The Toronto Star is really banging the drum to deify Butts and trash JWR. It's really not unexpected,either,but,it's really showing the Lib left's true colors. It's also really rich that Butts chose NOT to swear the oath. That way he can lie with impunity and avoid criminal code charges of perjury or conspiracy to commit. These fckres really need to get the boot. One lies,the other won't swear to it. No credibility,whatsoever.

Trudeau has just read a prepared statement and is taking questions about this clusterfudge. He is still banging the jobs drum. Says it was a breakdown in communication between Butts and JWR and he should have been more involved.

So now Canadians are to believe the most current narrative which is he didn't know his most trusted advisor and the AG were at loggerheads over saving SNC's skin. I call bullcrap. Not just a little cowpie either, a big stinking pile of it. If this mess is because he wasn't as involved as he should have (as he stated), what kind of mess would we have on our hands if he had gotten more involved?

So far in his press conference, he is really repeating Butt's testimony from yesterday.

Some "spin doctor" wrote the PM's excuse for him. He's not smart enough to think that up by himself. FFS!! What a load of BS.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by trimmer21

Some "spin doctor" wrote the PM's excuse for him. He's not smart enough to think that up by himself. FFS!! What a load of BS.

---

I think at this point Trudeau knows this is so bad he is sticking to the jobs excuse because he is trying to hang onto his seat in Papineau because that is what is playing well in Quebec. I think he knows this thing is probably going to cost him the majority.

Amanda Connolly from Global News asked the best question of the press conference. She asked “Is this an apology? Will you make an apology?” to which the PM glibly answered “I will be apologizing in Iqaluit today” (about the treatment of Inuit during TB outbreaks). It is a wonderment to see his tremendous ego in action sometimes. The only reason which I can think he would think this answer was appropriate is he truly experiences interactions and events differently than everyone else.

One of the many lines is that JWR should have come to Trudeau....yet the other members of cabinet have also said that nobody gets to Justin without going thru Butts, which was the guy she was arguing with......

I haven’t seen this angle reported in the media

So yesterday Butts repeatedly said to the justice committee that he didn't think JWR could come to a decision but if she had, she should have communicated that directly. The PM confirmed that JWR told him directly that her mind was made up and asked her to revisit her decision. So she did communicate her decision to the PM directly and then he told his staff to follow up with her about her revising her decision which they obviously did which JWR viewed as inappropriate.

So if my boss comes to me and asks me to do something which will help the company but is potentially illegal and I refuse because one person can not compel another to break the law. And I tell him my mind is made up not to do said act but he then gets his executive assistants to consistently ask me to do act, this behaviour is appropriate?

The libranos are in full damage control. They will do anything to get re-elected including supporting a company that bought $30,000 of hookers for a dictators son. Because Quebec jobs are at stake right? Well I guess prostitution is a job.