I tried to watch the entire thing but McKenna's shrill voice sounds like nails running down a chalkboard.
Printable View
Yeah, I skipped over Barbie’s part.
Here's an interesting article:
https://www.cbc.ca/news/opinion/trud...ints-1.5044266
Butts has started to testify.
He refused to be sworn in.....
Definition of testify
intransitive verb
1 : to make a solemn declaration under oath for the purpose of establishing a fact (as in a court)
So..basically folks, I'm going to answer some questions, with non-facts, and let you sort out what are lies and what aren't.....
.....this was the Liberals strategy? Hoping that it would be omitted? Hoping that the public wouldn't be aware that he wasn't sworn in?
Liberal Bull $
What sends up red flags for me is that Butts says neither he nor others who work in the PMO aren't lawyers yet insisted an accomplished lawyer, acting in the highest legal position in the country, needs an outside opinion when the AG and the AG staff had come up with an answer they did not like.
Here's exactly how things went.
Butts asked if he would swear in voluntarily. Butts refused.
( In Parliament, statements given are regarded as being under oath regardless. However, given the optics, he should have sworn in. The penalty for lying is being held in contempt of Parliament, whereas if lying under oath, he can be charged with perjury).
Conservatives table motion to compel Butts to swear under oath......defeated by Liberal majority government.
If no one has anything to hide....why exclude himself from swearing in? Why would the Liberal MPs not support a motion to ensure truth?