Posters complaining about the lack of interesting subject matter can address that issue by making interesting posts while avoiding conspiracy theories about big pharma, WEF, the NWO or similar topics.
Printable View
Posters complaining about the lack of interesting subject matter can address that issue by making interesting posts while avoiding conspiracy theories about big pharma, WEF, the NWO or similar topics.
100% AgreeQuote:
Originally Posted by Badenoch
Best post today! :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Badenoch
None of the moderators has really offered a satisfactory explanation of why the two threads I mentioned were removed. Perhaps the word “censorship” was a bit strong, but this forum seems to be steered away from any meaningful debate about anything that might possibly be deemed offensive to any minor part of society.
A lot like the rest of society I suppose….keep your head down, don’t ask questions, stop talking about important things and don’t stir the pot….while the country continues its slide.
silencing debate by the 90% to avoid offending the 10% isn’t a winning strategy.
Here lies the problem. When given a response that doesn't fit the me-centric ideology keep on hounding the issue.Quote:
Originally Posted by 73hunter
Quite simply its been observed when dealing with topics pertaining to personal values there is an inability to conduct a respectful debate where both sides in the end come to a mutual respect for their opponent and can come to a notion of you do you and I'll do me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badenoch
It's not a conspiracy when it completes a full circle.Quote:
Originally Posted by Birdbuff
Where is our agenda coming from? who is Canada partners with in the planing to take our guns away ? The wef lol kinda funny right.
Government of Canada already has it written on paper .
No conspiracy it's all ritten in black and white on the government of Canada website that they are partnered with the UN with the agenda.
Now who is the UN partnered with to FastTrack the agenda ? Again it's ritten on paper. That will be your answer and it's mentioned above lol.
Canada then the wef no connection at all lol.
Sent from my SM-G975W using Tapatalk
https://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...9e234d3e85.jpghttps://uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/202...1fe9b28c30.jpg
It would appear the owners of this website have concluded content of this type does not contribute to the site as they have envisioned it which is their right as owners. There are myriad other sites where full discussions can be had on this and related subjects.Quote:
Originally Posted by fishfood
Except that it’s hardly “me-centric”. There are quite a number of knowledgeable outdoorsmen that have left this forum because the “great crackdown” has stifled conversation that is in line with the views of the majority. Go ahead and take a poll of Trudeau’s approval rating within the outdoors community - I imagine you’ll find that the vast majority would applaud the video that GW posted. It’s not “hate speech” toward any definable group - it’s political parody which most would agree is deserved.Quote:
Originally Posted by finsfurfeathers
I agree with you. Had a chuckle with the video even harder at those who seriously believed the hyperbole. Actually in the mod discussion I was debating to keep it up. That was until it was brought to my attention the author of the vid choose to leave the realm of satire to disrespectful banter by the choice of title. Can't believe we have to repeat yet again respectful debate good, disrespectful redirect bad.Quote:
Originally Posted by 73hunter
Why is it so hard of a concept? (rhetorical question answer not needed or wanted)
I actually post quite a bit in fact probably one of the most prolific posters. However if all posts were to drop say to 1 post a month would this be much of a site?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badenoch