So questions then.
Why should any public servant be entitled to a tax payer funded pension? Isn't that an income you receive Mike from the state, paid for by others? When the majority don't/can't benefit from.
Anyone with RSPs. Why do you feel, you are entitled to significant tax breaks, ( state provided income) when the majority don't or can't benefit from them?
Cases where "UBI" is good because it's just for the few? Ands in particular, the wealthy few? Say those, who earn enough that they should be fully capable of taking care of themselves......
Can't remember if it was this thread, or another where PP called spades, spades. With respect to people living off wages, paycheck to paycheck, taxation. And those that have tangible assets and "net worth".