The government doesn't need the political liability with vax mandates for workers. Employer's obligations to ensure safe work places under the OHSA already cover that as we're seeing in the private sector all over the province.
Printable View
The government doesn't need the political liability with vax mandates for workers. Employer's obligations to ensure safe work places under the OHSA already cover that as we're seeing in the private sector all over the province.
No worries, you like to refer to others as anti-vaxxers, I don't cry about, just like to return the favor. See how that works....who cares...Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkB
The only divide has been created by trying to force people into medical experiments
Attachment 42541
Mass protests MSM won't report..cheers
What snow flakes is he referring to. I'll tell you who they are they are all these self-righteous liberals that hang off of every word justlied tells them. I myself am double vaxxed and do I care if the person next to me is unvaxxed not in the least as we both made our own choices. So yes who cares if someone is unvaxxed if you are vaxxed as there is nothing to worry about. If the vaxxed are still worried about the unvaxxed go live under a rock while the rest of us Carry on with life.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkB
Agreed ... this generalization that all vaxxed are sheep and snowflakes is just so stupid.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tigboy 304
CARRY ON WITH LIFE ... nothing to see here. 100%
Almost as bad as..Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkB
Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkB
I think people should have a choice to take vaccines!Quote:
Originally Posted by canadaman30
You think people who are against the vaccine shouldn't be called anti-vaxxers?? What?
OK, what are they then?? What is the politically correct term, lol. (and here we are calling
vaxxers snowflakes, lol).
^^^ READ THIS ^^^^^
Mike, lol ... you are really grabbing at thin air. Why you guys acting like snowflakes all of a sudden??Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePal
Tell me what is unfactual that there are lots of anti-vaxxers that do not eat healthy food, smoke and/or drink?
1) IMO the term is dishonest, and has connotations of a backwards hillbilly who's never heard of SCIENCE (the new secular religion). That's how it is used.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkB
It's like calling someone racist for pointing out statistics on government handouts worsening certain problems.
"What, you're skeptical of reckless spending? Haha you must hate minorities!"
Or like calling any Trump supporter a Nazi. Same thing. There is a smug and condescending note to those who use the anti-vaxxer phrase. The uppity Leaside liberals who think their *&^$ doesn't stink. Same with the anti-masker phrase.
Many people who are skeptical of these dangerous experimental jabs have received other vaccinations. So it's not an accurate title. It's simply a way of lumping anyone who disagrees with you together and demonizing your political/ideological opponents so that you can just dispense with them without actually engaging their arguments. What's the saying, when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
2) I could care less what people call me. I don't want to police anyone's speech.
Both 1 & 2 can be true simultaneously.
The term "anti-vaxxer" predates COVID has been frequently used to describe people who do not accept vaccines nor allow their children to be vaccinated. It is an accurate and appropriate term to describe people who refuse to take the COVID vaccinations as are "anti-lockdown" and "anti-mask" for people who oppose those public health measures.
And Factually...there is a whole whack of vaccinated people that fill the same description..so why are you continuing to associate that behavior to only the anti-vaxxers ??Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkB