I've had progressive lenses for a long time now and other than maybe the first month to get used to them I have no issues at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by mosquito
Printable View
I've had progressive lenses for a long time now and other than maybe the first month to get used to them I have no issues at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by mosquito
I get partial reimbursement for my eye exams and glasses through our Sun Life Plan. Glasses...it amounts to $250 every two years. The last pair I bought from the Optometrist office were $600.....
We now buy our glasses from Zennie Optical online. Very slick and easy website and I can get progressives for about $250 (CDN) . I bought a few pairs of prescription dedicated 'reader' glasses as well. They come in around $150.
This decision by the Optometrists hurts the low-hanging fruit, struggling parents with kids and seniors with lower incomes. But the real cause of the problem is the Ontario governments refusal to pay them for their services. With all the money floating around, you'd think it was a no-brainer.
The link you posted say's the gov't pays about 55% of the cost, leaving the optometrist's to absorb the remaining 45%. It goes on to say that the amount paid is on average $44.65. Using simple math, that comes out to around $80 total for an exam, according to OAO? What the article doesn't say, is how much of an increase are they asking for? If they want my sympathy, they'll have to throw out the numbers of what they are asking the gov't to pay them.Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePal
I gathered they want the full coverage of the exam...appro $90 vs the $44 they get nowQuote:
Originally Posted by Bushmoose
Quote:
According to the association, the province paid optometrists $39.15 on average for an exam in 1989 and now pays $44.65 for the service. group said that has optometrists absorbing 45 per cent of the cost of an OHIP-covered eye exam.
“It’s costing me $98 in operating costs to provide an eye exam to OHIP patients,” said Salaba, who has a practice in Hamilton, noting that clinics shoulder costs associated with paying staff, rent, equipment and utilities.
Exactly!Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushmoose
Neither of us know the numbers they are asking for. They throw percentages and averages out there, but it means nothing until the exact amount they're seeking, is known.Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePal
As a tax payer and contributor to our OHIP expenses, I don't appreciate helping to pay the extra cost the optometrists want to charge to supplement their lavish, huge store front office's that so many of them are operating out of. We aren't patients to them, we're customers. Until the obvious conflict of interest they have by selling over priced products to their "customers" is gone, they won't be getting any support from me.
Maybe it is how the graduated part was done and the small reading area but I just feel like Mr Bobblehead moving the reading spot around and to the top row to look for things etc. Having to move my head around and up and down etc. like a bobblehead looking for something, I'm never buying them again. Too expensive and too annoying for me, they seemed like a good idea and I paid the high price and it is good you can get them to work but bifocals maybe, graduated again, I'll pass,.Quote:
Originally Posted by smitty55
The one I use now (one of the Next Optical but not the one that advertises) doesn't seem to have upgraded and remodelled at all. Very clean, very friendly and seems to be more in patient than customer mode than the one I went to before. Like I said it was the optometrist that suggested getting Dollar store glasses for in the car and tackle box etc. , the customer optometrists would be suggesting a spare pair. Who knows how may years since they had an increase and the article says the "cost" of the exam etc., I would like to know how they calculated their "costs" for one. The "costs" hmm , I know I was in the room maybe 15 minutes and if they are talking $80 to $100 per customer, their "costs" are over $240 to $300 an hour (assuming 3 customers per hour). There are of course some optometrists that when you walk in you are a credit card with eyes and they want to max out their income or want the fanciest shop etc. but for the average one I wonder.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushmoose
Right now the dentist I have has a much reduced cost for those without insurance and an Optometrist that suggests dollar store glasses for spares... seems some are running it like a business but still care about the patient. The complete refusal however is just punitive to the poor and extortion in my book until I know more.
I just talked with the local optometrist about the issue with the provincial government which at this point is refusing to come to the table to discuss the issues. What it boils down to is that an eye exam costs around $90 for the optometrist to do with the cost of his time and the equipment. The exams take up to an hour depending on the doctors and the tests done. 30 years ago OHIP paid $39 of that cost and at this time they still only pay $43, so an increase of only 10% over 30 years. No wonder they're upset with Ford, cant say I blame them. Also they were shut down totally for 3 months with the first lockdown with no government support, that's a huge loss of income. So at the present time they just want the government to at least start to address the issues.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bushmoose
Its all part of the magnificent service you receive when you vote in a Conservatives Government.
"The Ontario Financing Authority, which manages the provinces' debt, says that as of March 31, 2020 (for the 2019-20 fiscal year), the Ontario government's net debt is CDN $353.3 billion. Net debt is projected to rise to $398 billion in 2020-21.
So how does that work Mike? Do you send in your prescription and pick the frames you want and then they give you a quote? The prescription tab on that site doesn't ask for much. My last set of progressives were around $600 for me. Prices are crazy compared to the states.Quote:
Originally Posted by MikePal