Quote:
3 years ago contracts were stripped under a new Ontario law. Teachers have not had a contract since then. My other half is a teacher so I see the communiques that are shared from the Unions. I'm not a great lover of unions but I can see what they are currently fighting.
The government came to the table with further reductions and stripping items out of their previous contract.....that's not going to go well for any employee group especially when our illustrious govt sees fit to give the OPP an 8.5% raise over 3 years….
The OPPs raise is covered by the municipalities, not QP. It was an easy way to give out some love buy some favor support (their favorite thing) without paying the price themselves. Politically a brilliant move. This though means that many rural communities are having to jack land taxes substantially. Imagine being a senior on a fixed income with soaring hydro and land taxes and..Or living in one of those area’s hit hard by job losses (plants, manufacturing)
If the Unions haven’t signed the contracts presented back in 2011? Why, what the heck is the problem?
If memory serves me right, banked sick days was the primary issue back then. And the reason that was/is an issue is because.
1) After banking years worth Teachers were calling in sick when they weren’t and using them
2) After banking years worth Teachers were using them as small golden parachutes
I get it, teachers do need sick time. They work in environments….
Fine make sure based on historical averages they have enough per year. But banked? Get real, this isn’t the 1970s anymore.
I do get it, as Ive said I have friends/family that are teachers. Do “they” not realize the state of things and are they unwilling to do what they can or should? Especially given they have helped create the mess..And prior to 2010 were the recipients of over spending/over hiring?
/dons facetious hat
Maybe if they all took a 3% or 5% haircut, or if just those above the duo income mean took a 5% haircut. Maybe if there weren’t 90 teachers in Hamilton on the Sunshine list, or that one elementary teacher on it (who somehow earned $200,000 in 2014)
$200,0000 alone could hire 3 young teachers.
There would be money for smaller classrooms (20 per, and maybe young kids wouldn’t be home with a lot of HW and would instead get to spend quality time with their parents). Maybe many of those young teachers on contracts could get hired full time. And teachers (Unions) wouldn’t be complaining that the govt doesn’t have the money to give our kids the education they deserve.
/food for thought
Correct me if I’m wrong.
Many accepted a 2% or a 2.5% raise last time around. I know there was one that balked at that, didn’t feel it was enough, didn’t sign….that was the one Ms Wynne handed 500mm to along with the OPPs raise to buy their “labor peace”…Too bloody bad, imo.
divide $500,000,000 by $50,000
How many new full time teachers is that?
And for those that did accept the 2%-2.5%. Thats still well above what most of the real world has and is getting.